difference is not division








NAVIGATION:

· comfusion mainpage
· issue archive
· stickboy

[Debate]

Military Recruiters Leave No Child Behind (Except the Rich)


Tamara Thompson

Military strategists and government PR handlers know that a draft swiftly turns public sentiment against war—any war. Yet it’s clear that war with Iraq is likely to be both protracted and casualty-intensive, making the demand for fresh American bodies especially high. But with voluntary military enlistment so sluggish over the past two decades, what’s a world superpower to do to fill out the ranks?

Apparently, somebody was planning ahead for just such a quandary when Congress enacted the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 last year. The cornerstone of Bush’s “groundbreaking” education reform package turns out to be the cornerstone of the U.S. military recruitment effort as well.

Buried within the Act’s school accountability standards, testing requirements, and instruction protocols is a little-noticed provision that calls for unfettered military access to student records. Part E, Subpart 2, Section 9528 of the Act requires high schools nationwide to release a complete record of student names, addresses, and phone numbers to military recruiters—without prior parental consent or even after-the-fact notification.

Even more troubling is that the requirement actually has teeth. Compliance is directly linked to federal funding provided to school districts under the Act. Individual schools that refuse to hand over the contact information jeopardize funding for their entire district.

While, ostensibly, parents can request that their child’s information be withheld, most are unlikely to ever know they have that option. Schools are only required to tell parents once a year that such information could eventually be shared with the military; this notification can be as informal as inclusion in a single PTA bulletin or other material that parents are “likely to see.” Even then, the military is invariably buried in a large list of groups with whom schools share student information, such as cap-and-gown companies and class-ring vendors.

Suppose a conscientious parent does actually notice, and chooses to opt out of the information sharing; it still won’t be enough to shield their kids from military recruitment propaganda. The Act also requires that schools “shall provide military recruiters the same access to secondary school students as is provided generally to post-secondary education institutions or to prospective employers of those students.”

In other words, if a school allows college scouts or job fair hiring reps to interact with students on campus, they must allow military recruiters to do so as well. Reaching kids early and enamoring them with the military without parental interference is clearly the goal of the program.

Interestingly, though, private high schools that “maintain a religious objection to service in the Armed Forces” are exempt from the policy, meaning children whose parents can afford a private school education—read: white, upper class—are insulated from the recruitment drive. (Public schools with boards that oppose the policy on similar grounds don’t have the same flexibility to refuse.)

This new school recruitment policy will help ensure that mostly middle and lower class kids fight this war while the sons of the privileged get a pass. Maybe the military’s new school recruitment motto should be “Leave No Child Behind—Except the Rich.”

Learn More:

Policy letter from Secretary of Education Rod Paige and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld

Explanation and legal basis of the policy

Description of families’ rights related to disclosure of student information

Official No Child Left Behind Website